|
|
______________________________
artsJAM
Detroit!
Work
Alternatives for Youth
_____________________________________________________
Program Evaluation Summary
by Michael Gielniak, Lead
Researcher
with Philippe Bitton, Research Assistant
______________________________
|
|
Promoting creative
power in people with disabilities. |
The primary goal of the artsJAM Detroit! Work Alternatives for Youth program is to provide arts education for youth (ages 14-26) with disabilities to increase their artistic skills and prepare them for the world of work. The goal of this study, however, is to provide VSA arts of Michigan an evaluation of the program's ability to develop the skills necessary to help students with disabilities transition to the world of work.
VSA arts of Michigan partnered with the Skillman Foundation, the Youth Sports and Recreation Commission of the cities of Detroit, Highland Park and Hamtramck, special education administrators in the Detroit Public Schools, Highland Park Community Schools and Hamtramck Public Schools, and the VSA arts national organization in Washington D.C., to provide funding for the program.
An application process was conducted for the artsJAM
Detroit! Work Alternatives for Youth program toward the end of the 2003-2004
school year. Well over 100 students from Detroit, Hamtramck and Highland Park
applied for the 25 positions in the program. School counselors and social
workers were asked to recommend students for the program, and then VSA staff
conducted interviews and selected participants. Students participating in the
program are emotionally, cognitively, and physically impaired. Three
participants are autistic. Criteria for selection included:
· Students receiving special education services in their school district
· Previous participation in the artsJAM Detroit! program
· Representation from a variety of individual schools within the three
participating school districts
Basic demographic information about participating schools is listed below.
3031
West Grand Blvd, Suite 485
Detroit, Michigan 48202
Detroit Publics Schools is a large urban district that faces the typical challenges of most urban public schools. The district services over 145,000 students of which almost 70% are economically disadvantaged. The passing rate for the district on the state standardized test is 30%, which is far below the state average. The percentage of students receiving special education services is 13%, which is above the state average*.
Table 1
|
Grades Served |
Enrollment |
Free or Reduced Lunch (%) |
MEAP Passing Rate (%) |
Special Education (%) |
|
K-12 |
146,189 |
68.7 |
30 |
13 |
Table 2
|
Median Household Income |
27,227 |
|
Less than $15,000 (%) |
31.7 |
|
14 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
8.2 |
3201 Roosevelt
Hamtramck, Mi 48212
Hamtramck Schools is a small district within the boundaries of the city of Detroit. The district faces tremendous challenges because of their highly diverse population of non-English speakers. The district services 3,657 students of which over 80% are economically disadvantaged. The passing rate for the district on the state standardized test is 25%, which is far below the state average. The percentage of students receiving special education services is 6.5%, which is below average in the state*.
Table 3
|
Grades Served |
Enrollment |
Free or Reduced Lunch (%) |
MEAP Passing Rate (%) |
Special Education (%) |
|
K-12 |
3,657 |
81.8 |
25.4 |
6.5 |
Table 4
|
Median Household Income (%) |
25,450 |
|
Less than $15,000 (%) |
32.7 |
|
15.5 |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
8.2 |
20 Bartlett Street
Highland Park, Mi 48203
Highland Park Community Schools is also a small district within the boundaries of the city of Detroit. Although it is not a large urban district, Highland Park faces the same challenges as other urban districts dealing with high levels of poverty. The district services 2,968 students of which approximately 67% are economically disadvantaged. The passing rate for the district on the state standardized test is 15.5%, which is among the lowest in the state. The percentage of students receiving special education services is 14.6%, which is above the state average*.
Table 5
|
Grades Served |
Enrollment |
Free or Reduced Lunch (%) |
MEAP Passing Rate (%) |
Special Education (%) |
|
K-12 |
2,968 |
66.9 |
15.5 |
14.6 |
Table 6
|
17,010 |
|
|
Less than $15,000 (%) |
46 |
|
8.5 |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
8.2 |
Target Behavior Coding
Sheet (see appendix 1)
The artsJAM director and social worker identified target
behaviors prior to the start of the program. The target behaviors list was also
influenced by Junior Achievement's list of Life Skills, which include behaviors
that Junior Achievement consider important to job performance and social
integration. The target behaviors are formatted into a functional observation
sheet with categories for the target behavior, positive and negative expressions
of the behavior, and researcher comments. The positive and negative behavior
category is divided into quarters, which represent 15-minute intervals.
The target behaviors include:
· Listens
· Follow Directions
· Focuses Attention
· Body Language
· Voice Tone
· Accepts Criticism
· Accepts Differing Opinions
· Gives Constructive Criticism
· Shares Supplies
· Cleans Own Mess
·
Actively Participates
Student Goal Sheet (see
appendix 2)
The Student Goal Sheet is intended to start a conversation with the student about the goals of the artsJAM program, appropriate work behaviors and the student's personal strengths and weaknesses. At the beginning of the program each student is asked to identify three things to work on during the program, as well as strategies the student will use to achieve each of their goals.
Student Goal Sheet Final
Review (see appendix 5)
At the end of the program, the artsJAM director and social worker interview students again. This interview is intended to assess whether or not the student achieved his/her goals and to debrief the artsJAM experience.
Student Weekly Assessment
(see appendix 4)
Students complete the weekly assessment at the end of each work week. This assessment is intended as a simple way for students to reflect on their behavior and track their progress toward meeting their goals. The assessment specifically asks students to identify weekly successes and to identify challenges that still need to be addressed.
Student Daily Assessment
(see appendix 3)
The management team created a daily assessment that can be
quickly completed by the students. The assessment includes three categories:
· Getting along with others
· Active participation
· Challenge myself to do my best
Students use colored stickers to identify if their behavior is good (green), needs improvement (yellow), or is unacceptable (red). Because the assessment sheet includes a row for each workday, the student and social worker can visually identify trends in behavior throughout the program.
Parent Survey
The management team expressed concern about parents completing and returning surveys. The management team, therefore, decided that it would be more effective to survey parents at the culminating event. The researcher prepared two open-ended questions and surveyed parents as they entered the culminating event and during the event afterglow. The two questions were:
1. Have you noticed any effects of the artsJAM program on your child? Describe.
2. Do you have any concerns about the program or suggestions for improvement?
Work Product
The students created books during the morning work session. The books are creative products that involved making artist paper for the book cover, cutting pages, formatting, binding the books, and packaging them for retail sale. This work was accomplished under the direction of a visual artist in a simulated work environment. The students created over 600 books of varying shapes, sizes and designs.
Target Behaviors
Students were video taped for one hour during the morning
work session for two consecutive days at the beginning and at the end of the
program. Coding Sheets were used to score each student's expression of the
target behaviors. Each target behavior was recorded as pre or post variables in
an SPSS database (statistical analysis software). The mean of each pre variable
was matched with its corresponding post variable and a Paired Sample T-Test was
used to analyze increases or decreases in the target behavior at the end of the
program. In this study, significance is identified at less than .06.
Interrater
reliability. Two raters
independently watched the video taped sessions and scored each of the pre and
post target behavior variables. Variables were scored as 1=positive expression
of the behavior, 0 as acceptable behavior, and -1 as a negative expression of
the target behavior. Agreement was 97.1% or higher for each variable and
98.0%for total combined pre and post behaviors. Any discrepancies were resolved
through discussion with the lead researcher.
Student Goal Sheet, Weekly
Assessment and Final Review
Thematic exploration was used to consolidate, chart and compile emerging themes identified on the Student Goal Sheets, Weekly Assessments and the Goal Sheet Final Reviews.
Student Daily Assessment
The Student Daily Assessment data was used to create a time study to investigate changes in student self-reported behaviors. The results of the time study were then compared to the results of the Target Behavior analysis to identify correlations or discrepancies.
Parent Survey
Thematic exploration was used to consolidate, chart and compile emerging themes identified in the Parent Survey data.
Work Product
One of the artsJAM program goals was to help prepare students for the world of work. Since the video taped observations took place during the morning simulated work sessions, it seems appropriate to examine student productivity during these sessions. The artsJAM director identified a goal of 100-200 packaged products by the completion of the program to the lead researcher before program began.
A paired T-test analysis revealed that there was no
significant increase or decrease in the mean of six of the target variables.
These variables include:
· Listens
· Follows Directions
· Voice Tone
· Accepts Criticism
· Cleans own Mess
·
Actively Participates
Although there was no significant change in these target behaviors, it is interesting to note that there was a high level of acceptable behavior displayed by the students in all of the target behaviors from the beginning of the program. Acceptable behavior percentages for each variable ranged from 95.24% to 97.81%.
Table 7
|
Target
Behavior |
%
Acceptable Student Behavior |
|
Listens |
96.28 |
|
Follows Directions |
96.78 |
|
Focuses Attention |
97.62 |
|
Body Language |
97.81 |
|
Voice Tone |
96.39 |
|
Accepts Criticism |
95.24 |
|
Accepts Differing Opinions |
100* |
|
Gives Constructive Criticism |
97.28 |
|
Shares Supplies |
96.60 |
|
Cleans Own Mess |
96.83 |
|
Actively Participates |
97.18 |
*There were no positive or negative expressions of behavior for this variable. No situations arose during the video taped sessions that required the students to accept, or not accept, differing opinions.
Four of the paired variables did show a significant change in behavior. Three of the paired variables (focuses attention, body language, and gives constructive criticism) show a small, but negative increase in the target behavior.
Focuses Attention
The focuses attention variable is at the borderline of the study's established significance level of .06. The overwhelming majority of students displayed acceptable behavior in the pre and post examination and students stayed focused just over 2% less at the end of the program than when the program began.
Table 8
|
|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
|
Focuses Attention Pre
& Post |
20 |
.429 |
.059 |
Table 9
Body Language
Students used acceptable body language 97.35% of the time. Body language was, however, 2.57% worse at the end of the program in comparison with student body language at the beginning of the program.
|
|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
|
Body Language Pre
& Post |
20 |
.527 |
.017 |
Table
11
Gives Constructive
Criticism
Because there was not much group discussion during the observation periods, student criticism was only observed in casual discuss while students worked. Student discussions remain appropriate 97.35% of the time. Negative criticism, although infrequent, increased by 2.66%.
Table 12
|
|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
|
Constructive
Criticism Pre & Post |
20 |
.546 |
.013 |
Table
13
Shares Supplies
The shares supplies variable is the only variable that met statistical significance and showed a positive increase. At 3.4%, this variable also had the highest level of change, positive or negative. Again, a high percentage of students displayed appropriate behavior throughout the program.
Table 14
|
|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
|
Sharing Behaviors Pre
& Post |
20 |
.703 |
.001 |
Table
15
All Variables from
two-day Observation Pre & All Variables from two-day Observation Post
Although the data clearly shows that there was not a significant change in student overall behavior, it is important to note a few of the statistics. First, there was a small negative increase in behaviors. Because the significance level is at .228, no claim of change can be made. The fact that students displayed acceptable behavior 97.35% of the time, on the other hand, is without dispute.
Table 16
|
|
N |
Correlation |
Sig. |
|
All Variables Pre
& Post |
19 |
.290 |
.228 |
Table 17
The project director and social worker indicated that most
of the students seemed nervous about the goal setting process. Goal setting was
facilitated through a private interview with each student. It is possible that
the students felt apprehensive about the process because it was called an
"interview" and they were concerned that if they did not pass their
interview, they would be removed form the program. It is also possible that the
formal nature of the process intimidated them. The students were aware that two
adults would be questioning them during the interview and that the interviews
would be conducted in a private office with the door closed.
There are possible positive and negative relationships that
one could support between student nervousness and interview performance. For
example, because the process was formal, students seemed to perceive the process
as something very serious. This perception could lead to greater student
reflection and preparedness. On the other hand, the project director and social
worker reported that some students were reluctant to make any comments and in
some cases they had to help students formulate their responses. This could lead
to a lack of understanding and ownership of the student's goals. A lack of
understanding and ownership of their goals could make the student less likely to
achieve these goals.
All of the students had seemingly appropriate goals identified and strategies to achieve the goals during the program. Most of the identified goals are behavioral and fall into three categories: appropriate participation and communication. A majority of students also consistently reflect these goals in the statements they make on the weekly self-assessments. 20% students identified goals that were in no way reflected through their weekly assessment comments.
The time study of the self reported student daily self-assessment revealed similar findings to those observed in the analysis of the target behaviors. A large percentage of students reported their behavior as "good" in the three categories: getting along with others, active participation, and challenge myself to do my best. Furthermore, there was no significant change in student self-reporting over the course of the program.
Seven cases in which students rated their behavior in the
three categories as "good." Three of these cases match observed
behavior from the coded target behaviors. Four of the cases are not congruent
with the target behavior observations.
The Student Daily Assessment data was used to create a time study to investigate changes in student self-reported behaviors. The results of the time study were then compared to the results of the Target Behavior analysis to identify correlations or discrepancies.
80% of students provided appropriate weekly comments.
Appropriate comments are defined as statements that either reflects the
student's initial goals or address specific challenges the student faced during
the week. The most common statements identified specific behavioral issues that
arose during the week. Below is a typical example of this.
·
These are the things that went well for me today:
I was not
talking about other people.
·
Things I still need to work on:
I talk alot.
20% of students wrote statements that did not reflect their
goals or challenges. For example,
to the question "These are the things that went well for me this
week," these students responded with comments such as
·
My best friend is ______ & ______
·
We will go to arts
·
I had a good time coming back home
·
Everything went well (repeated every week)
Family members were surveyed as they entered the
culminating event or during the afterglow of the culminating event. Every
student had at least one parent or family member in attendance at this event.
100% of family members indicated that the program had a
positive effect on the participating student. 21% of those were so enthusiastic
in their support for the program that they were almost brought to tears.
All of the parent comments divided into two main categories: affective or
practical. Affective comments included a variety of descriptions indicating a
student's greater sense of self. Parents expressed this idea of self-concept in
a variety of ways. The comments included such ideas as
· Child has greater self-awareness
· Child is proud of him/herself
· Child is more confident
· Child is more independent
·
Child is more responsible
To more clearly illustrate this point it may be helpful to
view a few parent quotes. The following is a small sample of specific feedback
received in regard to student self-concept.
"I have witnessed my child
become more aware of his surroundings."
"I have seen (my child)
take an interest in his personal appearance."
"To say that this program
is a gem is not at all true it is a Godsend. VSA has given my child an increased
level of self-esteem and a sense of peace."
"Through VSA, I saw (my
child) evolve into a more articulate, independent young teenager, whose social
interaction with his peers, developed more than at any other point in his young
life."
"I am so proud of my son I
really did not think that he would have got as far as he did."
The last quote indicates an unexpected finding that was
expressed by 33% of those surveyed. These family members indicated that they did
realize that the participant was capable of some of the things that he/she had
achieved. One parent, for example, was initially concerned about their child
navigating the public transportation system to travel to and from the program
site. Another parent did not expect their child to be able to work with others
in a productive way throughout the program. 40% of respondents described their
surprise at the high level quality in the student's products.
There was one recurring practical theme that emerged from the parent comments.
67% of the parents described extended benefits to their
child being paid for their work in the program. Three parents indicated that it
provided them an opportunity to work with their child on money management
skills.
Only one parent offered a suggestion for improvement of the program. The parent hoped that some transportation assistance could be provided. None of the respondents expressed concerns or criticisms of the program.
As was stated in the introduction, the primary goal of this
study is to provide VSA arts of Michigan an evaluation of the artsJAM program's
ability to develop the skills necessary to help students with disabilities
transition to the world of work.
The researcher and the management team did not anticipate
the high percentage of students that would meet the target behaviors at the
beginning of the program. Although
the study did not find significant positive increases in the student target
behaviors, it is notable that the students were able to maintain appropriate
behavior on all of the target behaviors at least 95% of the time. This
phenomenon may be attributed to several factors, including the application
process, the fact that the program paid students for their work, goal setting,
or the expectations set out at the beginning of the program. More study is
needed to delineate a cause and effect relationship between the program and any
one of these factors.
Students also displayed a small increase in negative
behavior on three of the target behaviors: focuses attention, body language, and
gives constructive criticism. This negative change may be related to an
observation made by both of the independent raters. Both raters commented to the
lead researcher that there was a noticeable difference in classroom management
during the taped sessions near the end of the program. For example, several
students sat for nearly 20 minutes without the materials needed to begin work at
the beginning of taped session 3. Also, at the end of the day 3 and 4 work sessions, several
students completed their work, cleaned up, and were not sure what they should be
doing. The program director also commented to the lead researcher that there was
less organization during the morning work sessions toward the end of the
program.
Despite the three small increases in negative behavior,
when the combined variables were analyzed, the overall change in the target
behaviors was not statistically significant. The researcher did see, however,
some change in student behavior.
Student self-awareness emerged as an important theme in the student goal sheets, weekly self-assessments, the daily self-assessments and in the parent comments. Prochaska (Prochaska, DiClemente, & Norcross, 1992; Prochaska, Norcross, & DiClemente, 1994; Prochaska, Redding, & Evers, 1997) studied the connection between self-awareness and behavior change for over 2 decades and developed the Transtheoretical Model. Their work revealed that behavior change evolves through different stages:
Stage 1: Precontemplation
Individuals in this stage do not believe they have a problem and have
often constructed defenses that aid in denial of the problem.
Stage 2: Contemplation
Individuals acknowledge having a problem and begin to deliberately
increase awareness and knowledge related to the problem.
Stage 3: Preparation
Before initiating behavior change, individuals should reevaluate
themselves with respect to the problem, develop commitment to change, and
construct a detailed plan for change. By the time they reach this stage,
individuals begin to perceive greater benefits than barriers to change.
Stage 4: Action
Behavior change is initiated. Others are likely to recognize a person's
progress toward change. After at least 6 months in the action stage, the person
may move into the fifth stage.
Stage 5: Maintenance
Though change is maintained more easily now, some vigilance is still
required to avoid slips or setbacks. If and when the change becomes so automatic
that there is no possibility of reverting to a former behavior, the
goal--"Termination"--is reached.
Although somewhat anecdotal, the data collected seems to
indicate that students are at various stages of the Transtheoretical model.
For example, 20% of participants increased their use of the "needs
improvement" and "unacceptable" codes on their daily behavior in
the second half of the program, although the taped observations did not support
this change. This seems to indicate that the student's perception of his or her
own behavior changed over the course of the program. If this is true, it follows
that the student experienced an increase in awareness of his or her behavior.
60% of participants' daily self-assessment was congruent with their behavior
from the video taped sessions. This seems to indicate that the majority of
students have an accurate perception of their behavior.
Another indicator of an increase in self-awareness can be
found in many of the parent comments. The two comments listed below seem to
clearly indicate this awareness.
"I have witnessed my child
become more aware of his surroundings."
"I have seen (my child)
take an interest in his personal appearance."
The second comment also implies a behavioral change on the
part of the student. The parent goes on to explain that the child bathes more
often and has become highly conscious of his or her clothing. According to
Prochaska, this student is already in stage four of the Transtheoretical model:
Action.
20% of participants did not demonstrate the same level of
self-reflection on the weekly self-assessment as the rest of the students in the
program. For example, to the question "These are the things that went well
for me this week," these students responded with comments such as
·
My best friend is ______ & ______
·
We will go to arts
·
I had a good time coming back home
·
Everything went well (repeated every week)
It would be helpful to know if this lack of self-awareness is related to the participant's disability. Unfortunately, VSA was not provided with this information. Therefore, it is not appropriate to speculate about possible relationships.
Work Product
There is one strong indicator of that the artsJAM program met its intended goal. It is the fact that students were highly productive during the morning work sessions. Before the program began, the program director indicated to the lead researcher that she hoped the students would create 100-200 books during the work sessions. By the end of the program, however, the students had produced over 600 well-crafted books and had them packaged for retail sale. This is a 200% productivity increase over the original target goal.
Many aspects of the artsJAM Detroit! Work Alternatives
for Youth program are successful. The application and interview process, the
student goal sheets, the student weekly self-assessment and the student daily
self-assessment seem to generate high expectations and create an atmosphere of
accountability that keep students focused. The tools also require students to do
a considerable amount of self-reflection that seems to have contributed to
increasing or maintaining appropriate behavior throughout the program.
Considering this focus on self-reflection and what is known
about the precursors to behavior change, it is recommended that the target
behaviors be re-assessed. In addition, students did not often have the
opportunity to demonstrate some of the target behaviors. It would, therefore, be
advisable to cultivate a new list of target behaviors that identify student
self-reflection and appropriate participation in their work environment.
One question that immerged during this study is why some
students did not seem to demonstrate self-reflection. It would be helpful to
identify each participant's disability before the beginning of the program. This
research could yield important information about relationships between student
successes and disabilities. This information could also help the program
director and instructors make accommodations that might lead students with
particular disabilities to become more successful.
There were many aspects of the artsJAM program that were
not studied. The Junior Achievement activities and "Circle Time" are
two elements that may have had significant impact on student self-awareness,
behavior change and productivity. Expanding the study to include the impact of
these components, as well as the impact of the various arts activities, would
help develop a clearer picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the program.
Expanding the study would also provide the researcher the opportunity to factor
out influences of other parts of the program on the results defined by this
study. This would help substantiate the effectiveness of the tools used in this
study.
It became clear through an analysis of the data that the participants are working at dramatically different levels. Some students seem to possess the personal qualities and skills to transition to the workplace, while others may still need considerable training and experience. If the ultimate goal of the program is to help students transition to the world of work, it may be advisable to create two programs. The first program could be similar to the current artsJAM program. It would offer students a broad range of experiences and focus on self-reflection and developing appropriate behavior. The second program could be for students that have proven themselves reflective and responsible. These students could work on specific higher-level skills that they will need in the workplace. VSA could also facilitate internships or work placement as a culmination of this program.
*
Students with
disabilities (K–12) U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special
Education Programs. 2000. U.S. Department of Education. The figures shown
represent children ages 6 to 17 served under IDEA, Part B.
*
Students with
disabilities (K–12) U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special
Education Programs. 2000. U.S. Department of
Education. The figures shown represent children ages 6 to 17 served
under IDEA, Part B.
*
Students with
disabilities (K–12) U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special
Education Programs. 2000. U.S. Department of Education. The figures shown
represent children ages 6 to 17 served under IDEA, Part B.